Gladis v. Rooney

Missouri Court of Appeals

Gladis v. Rooney

61 S.W.3d 287, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 1768, 2001 WL 1187163

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gladis v. Rooney. Read the opinion of the Court — 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 1044 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 9, 2001·No. No. ED 78989·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, George and Mary Gladis, appeal the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County granting a motion for summary judgment in favor of respondents, Robert and Charlene Rooney. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law appears. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, George and Mary Gladis, appeal the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County granting a motion for summary judgment in favor of respondents, Robert and Charlene Rooney. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law appears. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Gladis v. Rooney, 61 S.W.3d 287, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 1768, 2001 WL 1187163 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

61 S.W.3d 287 (Gladis v. Rooney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.