Glading v. Philadelphia
51 A. 886, 202 Pa. 324, 1902 Pa. LEXIS 513
Opinion
The plaintiff was injured by stepping into a hole filled with dust and sweepings. It was in the pavement of a crowded thoroughfare in the central part of the city. Whether under the circumstances she exercised reasonable care was clearly a question for the jury.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Glading v. Philadelphia, 51 A. 886, 202 Pa. 324, 1902 Pa. LEXIS 513 (Pa. 1902).
51 A. 886 (Glading v. Philadelphia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
D'Annunzio v. Philadelphia Suburban Water Co.
18 A.2d 86 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1940)
Tolan v. Philadelphia
35 Pa. Super. 311 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1908)
Brown v. Milligan
33 Pa. Super. 244 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1907)