Glades, Inc. v. Glades Country Club Apts. Ass'n

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Glades, Inc. v. Glades Country Club Apts. Ass'n

502 So. 2d 1368, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 648, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7006

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 27, 1987

DocketNos. 86-459, 86-1180

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 502 So. 2d 1368 (Glades, Inc. v. Glades Country Club Apts. Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Glades, Inc. v. Glades Country Club Apts. Ass'n, 502 So. 2d 1368, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 648, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7006 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant raises five issues on appeal. The only issue with merit concerns the trial court's findings regarding the amount of attorney’s fees awarded to appellee.

Neither in the order awarding judgment for attorney’s fees, nor in the transcript of the hearing to establish the reasonable amount of those fees, does the trial judge comply with the requirements of Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1985) and Lake Tippecanoe Owners Association, Inc. v. Hanauer, 494 So.2d 226 (Fla.2d DCA 1986). We, therefore, affirm the trial court in all aspects except that we remand for the pur[1369]*1369pose of determining the amount of attorney’s fees to be awarded appellee after compliance with the dictates of Rowe.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and FRANK and SANDERLIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant raises five issues on appeal. The only issue with merit concerns the trial court's findings regarding the amount of attorney’s fees awarded to appellee.

Neither in the order awarding judgment for attorney’s fees, nor in the transcript of the hearing to establish the reasonable amount of those fees, does the trial judge comply with the requirements of Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1985) and Lake Tippecanoe Owners Association, Inc. v. Hanauer, 494 So.2d 226 (Fla.2d DCA 1986). We, therefore, affirm the trial court in all aspects except that we remand for the pur[1369]*1369pose of determining the amount of attorney’s fees to be awarded appellee after compliance with the dictates of Rowe.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and FRANK and SANDERLIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

502 So. 2d 1368, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 648, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7006, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glades-inc-v-glades-country-club-apts-assn-fladistctapp-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack