Gladden v. United States Department of Commerce

466 F. App'x 285
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gladden v. United States Department of Commerce. Read the opinion of the Court — 474 F. App'x 947
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 17, 2012·No. No. 11-1829·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Warren K. Gladden appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment in his action filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gladden v. Locke, No. 8:10-cv-01665-PJM, 2011 WL 2160573 (D.Md. May 31, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gladden v. United States Department of Commerce, 466 F. App'x 285 (4th Cir. 2012).

466 F. App'x 285 (Gladden v. United States Department of Commerce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.