Gladden v. State

511 So. 2d 766, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2113, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10101
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gladden v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1005
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 2, 1987·No. No. 4-86-1600·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court departed from the guidelines in sentencing appellant, setting forth six grounds in support of said departure, numbered “a” through “e,” in its order of July 11, 1986. We hold that only grounds “c” and “e” were valid grounds therefor.

Accordingly, following the dictates of Albritton v. State, 476 So.2d 158 (Fla.1985), and Campbell v. State, 486 So.2d 61 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986), we reverse the sentence and remand the cause to the trial court for resentencing since the state has failed to show beyond a reasonable doubt that the absence of the invalid reasons would not have affected the departure sentence or the extent thereof. See Albritton and Campbell.

REVERSED AND REMANDED, with directions.

DOWNEY, GUNTHER, JJ., and VITALE, LINDA L., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gladden v. State, 511 So. 2d 766, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2113, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10101 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

511 So. 2d 766 (Gladden v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Campbell v. State
486 So. 2d 61 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)