Gladden ex rel. Pickersgill v. Chapman

41 A. 735, 188 Pa. 586, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 650
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 14, 1898·No. Appeal, No. 46·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The opinion of the learned court below expresses fully our views upon the question involved in this contention. We do not feel that we could add anything of importance to what is there said, and we therefore affirm the judgment on the opinion.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gladden ex rel. Pickersgill v. Chapman, 41 A. 735, 188 Pa. 586, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 650 (Pa. 1898).

41 A. 735 (Gladden ex rel. Pickersgill v. Chapman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Frola's Petition
52 Pa. D. & C. 357 (Mercer County Court of Common Pleas, 1943)
Commonwealth v. Central Realty Co.
13 A.2d 312 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1939)
Lewis v. Wyalusing Light, Heat & Power Co.
62 Pa. Super. 282 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1916)