Gladd v. Brooklyn, Queens County & Suburban Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gladd v. Brooklyn, Queens County & Suburban Railroad

120 A.D. 886, 105 N.Y.S. 1117

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1907

StatusPublished

This text of 120 A.D. 886 (Gladd v. Brooklyn, Queens County & Suburban Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gladd v. Brooklyn, Queens County & Suburban Railroad, 120 A.D. 886, 105 N.Y.S. 1117 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order of the County Court of Queens county reversed and new trial ordered, costs to- abide the event, for error in the charge at folio 303, to the effect that the measure of the defendant’s duty with respect to the plaintiff while on the highway was the exercise of the highest degree of care and prudence and the utmost skill and foresight. Hirschberg, P. J., Woodward, Jenks, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order of the County Court of Queens county reversed and new trial ordered, costs to- abide the event, for error in the charge at folio 303, to the effect that the measure of the defendant’s duty with respect to the plaintiff while on the highway was the exercise of the highest degree of care and prudence and the utmost skill and foresight. Hirschberg, P. J., Woodward, Jenks, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 A.D. 886, 105 N.Y.S. 1117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gladd-v-brooklyn-queens-county-suburban-railroad-nyappdiv-1907.