GL by and Through Shull v. Zumwalt

564 F. Supp. 1030, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18392
CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri
DecidedMarch 21, 1983
Docket77-0242-CV-W-4
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 564 F. Supp. 1030 (GL by and Through Shull v. Zumwalt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
GL by and Through Shull v. Zumwalt, 564 F. Supp. 1030, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18392 (W.D. Mo. 1983).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

RUSSELL G. CLARK, Chief Judge.

Counsel for all parties presented, and the Court approved a consent decree regarding the provision of foster care for children in the Kansas City, Missouri area. It is at the request of plaintiffs’ counsel and because of the assistance this case may render other courts considering similar questions that the consent decree is published. Goldsby v. Carnes, 365 F.Supp. 395, 396 (W.D.Mo.1973).

INDEX

I. Licensing of Foster Homes ...........1031

II. Mandatory Training of Foster Parents .. 1033

III. Proper Matching of Foster Children with Foster Parents..............1033

IV. Pre-Placement Process and Supervision of the Foster Home..............1034

V. Prohibition on the Use of Improper Punishment of Foster Children.....1035

VI. Investigation of and Response to Suspected Incidents of Abuse and Neglect or Unsuitable Care .... 1035

VII. Elimination of Overcrowding in the Foster Home ...................1036

VIII. Rate of Reimbursement..............1036

IX. Caseload Size.......................1036

*1031 I N D E X — Continued

X. Social Service Worker Training........1036

XI. Medical Care.......................1037

XII. Essential Services...................1038

XIII. Permanency Planning................1038

XIV. Establishment of Uniform Case Record System..................1041

XV. Reporting and Monitoring ............1042

XVI. Costs and Attorneys’ Fees............1043

XVII. Damage Claim......................1043

CONSENT DECREE

Plaintiffs, identified as children in the custody of the Jackson County Office of the Missouri Division of Family Services, brought this action on March 28,1977, challenging practices and policies of defendants as violative of their rights to be protected from harm secured by the United States Constitution and by Title IV of the Social Security Act. On April 20, 1979, the Court certified this case as a class action for in-junctive and declaratory relief. The defendants have denied that they have violated plaintiffs’ rights. The case has been scheduled by the Court for trial on May 9, 1983. The parties have now agreed that it is in the best interests of all the parties that the case be resolved amicably between them without the necessity of trial. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, and subject to approval by the Court that the following agreement will be incorporated in a final judgment by consent in this case:

1. The Court has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this action and of all parties hereto. The Court has authority to grant the relief provided in this agreement.

2. Plaintiffs shall be protected from harm by defendants while plaintiffs are in foster care. To secure this right the defendants shall implement the following practices and procedures:

I. Licensing of Foster Homes

A. Defendants will establish a process to ensure that only those persons who possess the requisite qualities to be suitable foster parents and who are capable of providing a healthy, nurturing and safe home, are licensed to provide foster care for plaintiffs. Toward that end defendants shall adopt and implement the following practices.

B. Licensing Workers

1. The assessment study of each prospective foster parent shall be done by a professional social worker and approved by a Social Service Supervisor.

2. All social service workers who have responsibility for the licensing or renewal of licenses of foster homes shall receive two days of orientation training covering the licensing process, the practice issues attendant to the conduct of a home study and the decisions involved in assessing the suitability of the home and adequacy of parenting skills. They shall also be trained as to the specific psychological, emotional, physical and educational problems that foster children are likely to have.

3. Thereafter, all licensing workers shall receive one day of state-of-the-art training per year focused on standards and methods of assessing the acceptability of applicants for foster home licenses.

4. This training shall be conducted by qualified DFS employees or by outside consultants who are not in the regular employ of DFS.

5. The curriculum and written materials utilized in the training of licensing workers shall be provided to counsel for plaintiffs at least thirty (30) days prior to the commencement of the training. Defendants shall not unreasonably refuse to implement plaintiffs’ suggested revisions to the curriculum and written materials. This review process will continue for a period of five (5) years from the date of entry of this decree.

C. The Assessment Process

1. Prior to the licensure of a foster home, the licensing worker shall:

a. Interview each member of the family, including children and other adults living in the home, individually and collectively.

b. Conduct a home visit to evaluate the physical conditions of the home and the community which shall include an assessment of the home, living arrangements for the foster children, the community in which *1032 the prospective foster parents live, and the special resources available in the community such as diagnostic clinics, medical care, schools and recreational facilities.

c. Interview at least three references by either personal or telephone contact.

d. Review the Child Abuse Registry and police records.

e. Assess the foster parents and their children’s physical and mental health which shall include:

1. A physical for each parent using a form which will be developed by defendants and which will be submitted to plaintiffs’ counsel for approval within thirty (80) days of the date of entry of this decree.

2. History of hospitalization for either physical or emotional problems, including the reason and extent of the hospitalization, date(s) and current extent of problems.

3. Determine if any member of the family now living in the house ever received outpatient treatment at a mental hospital, mental health clinic, psychiatric clinic or from a psychiatrist, and if so provide reason, extent and nature of problems, date(s) and current extent of problems.

4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carson P. ex rel Foreman v. Heineman
240 F.R.D. 456 (D. Nebraska, 2007)
G.L. v. Stangler
873 F. Supp. 252 (W.D. Missouri, 1994)
Johnston v. J.K.C.
841 S.W.2d 198 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1992)
In Interest of JKC
841 S.W.2d 198 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1992)
In Re Interest of A.L.B.
743 S.W.2d 875 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1987)
In Re Lowry
464 A.2d 333 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
564 F. Supp. 1030, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gl-by-and-through-shull-v-zumwalt-mowd-1983.