GKN Driveline Newton LLC v. Electricfil De Mexico S.A. de C.V.

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan
DecidedApril 27, 2022
Docket4:21-cv-11945
StatusUnknown

This text of GKN Driveline Newton LLC v. Electricfil De Mexico S.A. de C.V. (GKN Driveline Newton LLC v. Electricfil De Mexico S.A. de C.V.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Michigan primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
GKN Driveline Newton LLC v. Electricfil De Mexico S.A. de C.V., (E.D. Mich. 2022).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION GKN DRIVELINE NEWTON, LLC,

Plaintiff, Case No. 21-cv-11945 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman v. ELECTRICFIL DE MEXICO S.A. de C.V.,

Defendant. __________________________________________________________________/ ORDER TERMINATING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE MOTION FOR ALTERNATIVE SERVICE (ECF No. 10) This action concerns a contractual dispute between two automotive product manufacturers: Plaintiff GKN Driveline Newton, LLC (“GKN”) and its supplier, Defendant Electroficil De Mexico S.A. de C.V. (“EFI”). On April 22, 2022, GKN filed the instant motion seeking leave to serve EFI via email, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(f)(3). (See Mot., ECF No. 10.) After GKN filed its motion, counsel for EFI entered an appearance in this action (see Appearance, ECF No. 11), and EFI moved to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) pursuant to a forum selection clause. (See Mot., ECF No. 12.) EFI’s motion did not contest service of process, and therefore EFI has waived any defense pertaining to insufficient service of process. See Boulger v. Woods, 917 F.3d 471, 476 (6th Cir. 2019) (“Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a defendant who files a motion under Rule 12 and fails to raise the defense of insufficient service of process ‘waives’ that defense.”) (quoting King v. Taylor, 694 F.3d 650, 656 (6th Cir. 2012)). Accordingly, the Court

TERMINATES AS MOOT GKN’s motion for leave to serve EFI via email (ECF No. 10). IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Matthew F. Leitman MATTHEW F. LEITMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: April 27, 2022

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on April 27, 2022, by electronic means and/or ordinary mail.

s/Holly A. Ryan Case Manager (313) 234-5126

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Allen King v. Eric Taylor
694 F.3d 650 (Sixth Circuit, 2012)
Portia Boulger v. James Woods
917 F.3d 471 (Sixth Circuit, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
GKN Driveline Newton LLC v. Electricfil De Mexico S.A. de C.V., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gkn-driveline-newton-llc-v-electricfil-de-mexico-sa-de-cv-mied-2022.