GK Group, LLC, Now Known as Downtown M&M Properties, LLC v. Mitchell Rudder Properties, LP Successor in Interest to Karbooke, Inc., and Citibank Texas N.A.

Court of Appeals of Texas

GK Group, LLC, Now Known as Downtown M&M Properties, LLC v. Mitchell Rudder Properties, LP Successor in Interest to Karbooke, Inc., and Citibank Texas N.A.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 30, 2012·No. 10-10-00359-CV·Published

Opinion

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-10-00359-CV

GK GROUP, LLC, NOW KNOWN AS DOWNTOWN M&M PROPERTIES, LLC, Appellant v.

MITCHELL RUDDER PROPERTIES, LP SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO KARBROOKE, INC., AND CITIBANK TEXAS N.A., Appellee

From the 85th District Court Brazos County, Texas Trial Court No. 09-001441-CV-85

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants have filed an “Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Appeal.” See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). It states that the parties have entered into a settlement agreement and

that Appellants seek dismissal of this appeal with costs to be assessed against the party

incurring them.

Dismissal of this appeal would not prevent a party from seeking relief to which it would otherwise be entitled. The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed with

each party to pay the costs in this behalf expended as they have been incurred.

REX D. DAVIS Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Dismissed Opinion delivered and filed May 30, 2012 [CV06]

GK Group, LLC v. Mitchell Rudder Properties, LP Page 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-10-00359-CV

GK GROUP, LLC, NOW KNOWN AS DOWNTOWN M&M PROPERTIES, LLC, Appellant v.

MITCHELL RUDDER PROPERTIES, LP SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO KARBROOKE, INC., AND CITIBANK TEXAS N.A., Appellee

From the 85th District Court Brazos County, Texas Trial Court No. 09-001441-CV-85

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants have filed an “Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Appeal.” See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). It states that the parties have entered into a settlement agreement and

that Appellants seek dismissal of this appeal with costs to be assessed against the party

incurring them.

Dismissal of this appeal would not prevent a party from seeking relief to which it would otherwise be entitled. The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed with

each party to pay the costs in this behalf expended as they have been incurred.

REX D. DAVIS Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Dismissed Opinion delivered and filed May 30, 2012 [CV06]

GK Group, LLC v. Mitchell Rudder Properties, LP Page 2

GK Group, LLC, Now Known as Downtown M&M Properties, LLC v. Mitchell Rudder Properties, LP Successor in Interest to Karbooke, Inc., and Citibank Texas N.A., (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

GK Group, LLC, Now Known as Downtown M&M Properties, LLC v. Mitchell Rudder Properties, LP Successor in Interest to Karbooke, Inc., and Citibank Texas N.A. (GK Group, LLC, Now Known as Downtown M&M Properties, LLC v. Mitchell Rudder Properties, LP Successor in Interest to Karbooke, Inc., and Citibank Texas N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.