Gjerde v. Pillsbury Co./general Mills, Inc.

732 N.W.2d 201, 2007 Minn. LEXIS 312, 2007 WL 1632200
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedMay 30, 2007
DocketA07-370
StatusPublished

This text of 732 N.W.2d 201 (Gjerde v. Pillsbury Co./general Mills, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gjerde v. Pillsbury Co./general Mills, Inc., 732 N.W.2d 201, 2007 Minn. LEXIS 312, 2007 WL 1632200 (Mich. 2007).

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed January 18, 2007, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that [s]ummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Lori S. Gildea Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hoff v. Kempton
317 N.W.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
732 N.W.2d 201, 2007 Minn. LEXIS 312, 2007 WL 1632200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gjerde-v-pillsbury-cogeneral-mills-inc-minn-2007.