Gjerde v. Pillsbury Co./general Mills, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Gjerde v. Pillsbury Co./general Mills, Inc.

732 N.W.2d 201, 2007 Minn. LEXIS 312, 2007 WL 1632200

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided May 30, 2007·No. A07-370·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed January 18, 2007, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that [s]ummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Lori S. Gildea Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed January 18, 2007, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that [s]ummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Lori S. Gildea Associate Justice

Gjerde v. Pillsbury Co./general Mills, Inc., 732 N.W.2d 201, 2007 Minn. LEXIS 312, 2007 WL 1632200 (Mich. 2007).

Pincite

732 N.W.2d 201 (Gjerde v. Pillsbury Co./general Mills, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related