Gjenashaj v. City of New York

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided October 23, 2020·No. 1:19-cv-04142·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

LORI GJENASHAJ, Plaintiff, 2 19cv4142 -against- ORDER THE CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., .

Defendants. WILLIAM H. PAULEY II, Senior United States District Judge: Defendants move to file portions of Exhibits F, I, J, N, and O under seal, (ECF Nos. 98-6, 98-9, 98-10, 98-14, and 98-15), of the Declaration of Edward Stone in Support of Plaintiffs Counterstatement to Defendant Lt. Harrison’s Rule 56.1 Statement and Statement of Additional Facts, (ECF No. 98). This Court has reviewed the proposed redactions and finds that they are narrowly tailored, limited in scope, and justified to protect The City of New York’s confidential information. See Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 120 (2d Cir. 2006). Accordingly, Defendants motion to file under seal is granted and Defendant is directed to file redacted copies on the public docket. Dated: October 23, 2020 SO ORDERED: New York, New York ‘SVs. “SA BF WILLIAM H. PAULEY III U.S.D.J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gjenashaj v. City of New York, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Gjenashaj v. City of New York (Gjenashaj v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)