Givens v. Zimmerman

Fourth Circuit

Givens v. Zimmerman

597 F. App'x 180

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 16, 2015

DocketNo. 14-2015

StatusPublished

This text of 597 F. App'x 180 (Givens v. Zimmerman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Givens v. Zimmerman, 597 F. App'x 180 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

[181]*181Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Greg P. Givens seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Givens v. Zimmerman, No. 5:12-cv-00155-FPS-JES, 2014 WL 4264837 (ND.W.Va. Aug. 27, 2014). We deny all of Givens’ pending motions, including his motions for sanctions, to strike, for consideration of additional issues, and for a hearing. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[181]*181Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Greg P. Givens seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Givens v. Zimmerman, No. 5:12-cv-00155-FPS-JES, 2014 WL 4264837 (ND.W.Va. Aug. 27, 2014). We deny all of Givens’ pending motions, including his motions for sanctions, to strike, for consideration of additional issues, and for a hearing. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

597 F. App'x 180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/givens-v-zimmerman-ca4-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack