Givens v. Randolph

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Givens v. Randolph. Read the opinion of the Court — 414 F. App'x 565
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 4, 2011·No. 10-2164·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-2164

DENNIS A. GIVENS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

REBECCA RANDOLPH; MAIN STREET FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION (Holding Co. for) Main Street Bank; KEITH C. GAMBLE; PULLIN, FOWLER, FLANAGAN, BROWN & POE, PLLC, individually, and collectively,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:10-cv-00026-FPS-JSK)

Submitted: February 28, 2011 Decided: March 4, 2011

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dennis A. Givens, Appellant Pro Se. Keith C. Gamble, PULLIN, FOWLER, FLANAGAN, BROWN & POE, PLLC, Morgantown, West Virginia; Stephen Mark Fowler, PULLIN, FOWLER, FLANAGAN, BROWN & POE, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Dennis A. Givens appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for sanctions pursuant to Federal Rule of

Civil Procedure 11. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Givens v. Randolph, No. 5:10-cv-00026-

FBS-JSK (N.D.W. Va. Aug. 12, 2010 & Sept. 15, 2010). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Givens v. Randolph, (4th Cir. 2011).

Givens v. Randolph (Givens v. Randolph) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.