Givens v. New York City Housing Authority

249 A.D.2d 133, 671 N.Y.S.2d 479, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4342
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 21, 1998·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Goodman, J.), entered on or about February 27, 1997, which, in an action against defendant Housing Authority for negligent hiring and retention of defendant employee, granted the Housing Authority’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The same public policy that prohibits discrimination in hiring on the basis of a criminal record (Correction Law §§ 752, 753) prohibits discrimination in terminating employment on the basis of a criminal record. We agree with the trial court that the three nonviolent convictions that the employee did not disclose in his employment application, in conjunction with the robbery conviction that the employee did disclose, did not, as a matter of law, give the Housing Authority reason to know that the employee had a propensity for violence, or was otherwise unsuited for employment as a caretaker under the factors listed in the statute (see, Ford v Gildin, 200 AD2d 224; Farrell v McIntosh, 221 AD2d 312, lv denied 87 NY2d 809). Accordingly, the jury verdict holding the Housing Authority liable for not terminating the employee after learning of his undisclosed convictions was properly set aside. We have considered plaintiffs’ other arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Williams, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Givens v. New York City Housing Authority, 249 A.D.2d 133, 671 N.Y.S.2d 479, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4342 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

249 A.D.2d 133 (Givens v. New York City Housing Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Noble v. Career Education Corp.
375 F. App'x 102 (Second Circuit, 2010)
Sato v. Correa
272 A.D.2d 389 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)