Givens v. Criswell

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Givens v. Criswell. Read the opinion of the Court — 425 F. App'x 236
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 21, 2010·No. 09-2226·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2226

GREG GIVENS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WILLIAM CRISWELL; REBECCA RANDOLPH; JOHN DOE, 1, individually and collectively,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

MAIN STREET BANK; UNITED BANK, d/b/a United National Bank; UNITED BANK – DUNBAR, d/b/a United National Bank; ROSELYN J. CANTINI, United Bank; OHIO COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA, Ohio County Prosecutor Office; WHEELING POLICE DEPARTMENT,

Defendants.

No. 09-2284

WILLIAM CRISWELL; REBECCA RANDOLPH; JOHN DOE, 1, individually and collectively,

and MAIN STREET BANK; UNITED BANK, d/b/a United National Bank; UNITED BANK – DUNBAR, d/b/a United National Bank; ROSELYN J. CANTINI, United Bank; OHIO COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA, Ohio County Prosecutor Office; WHEELING POLICE DEPARTMENT,

No. 10-1293

WILLIAM CRISWELL; REBECCA RANDOLPH; JOHN DOE, 1, individually and collectively,

MAIN STREET BANK; UNITED BANK, d/b/a United National Bank; UNITED BANK – DUNBAR, d/b/a United National Bank; ROSELYN J. CANTINI, United Bank; OHIO COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA, Ohio County Prosecutor Office; WHEELING POLICE DEPARTMENT,

No. 10-1325

WILLIAM CRISWELL; REBECCA RANDOLPH; JOHN DOE, 1, individually and collectively,

2 and

MAIN STREET BANK; UNITED BANK, d/b/a United National Bank; UNITED BANK – DUNBAR, d/b/a United National Bank; ROSELYN J. CANTINI, United Bank; OHIO COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA, Ohio County Prosecutor Office; WHEELING POLICE DEPARTMENT,

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:08-cv-00025-FPS-JSK)

Submitted: May 20, 2010 Decided: July 21, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Greg Givens, Appellant Pro Se. Lee Murray Hall, JENKINS FENSTERMAKER, PLLC, Huntington, West Virginia; Keith C. Gamble, PULLIN, FOWLER, FLANAGAN, BROWN & POE, PLLC, Morgantown, West Virginia; James Thomas McClure, GOMPERS, MCCARTHY & MCCLURE, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

3 PER CURIAM:

Greg Givens seeks to appeal various district court

orders in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) case. This court may

exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291

(2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28

U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial

Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The orders

Givens seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable

interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the

appeals for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Givens’ motion to

strike and dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Givens v. Criswell, (4th Cir. 2010).

Givens v. Criswell (Givens v. Criswell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)