Givens v. Criswell
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-2226
GREG GIVENS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM CRISWELL; REBECCA RANDOLPH; JOHN DOE, 1, individually and collectively,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
MAIN STREET BANK; UNITED BANK, d/b/a United National Bank; UNITED BANK – DUNBAR, d/b/a United National Bank; ROSELYN J. CANTINI, United Bank; OHIO COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA, Ohio County Prosecutor Office; WHEELING POLICE DEPARTMENT,
Defendants.
No. 09-2284
WILLIAM CRISWELL; REBECCA RANDOLPH; JOHN DOE, 1, individually and collectively,
and MAIN STREET BANK; UNITED BANK, d/b/a United National Bank; UNITED BANK – DUNBAR, d/b/a United National Bank; ROSELYN J. CANTINI, United Bank; OHIO COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA, Ohio County Prosecutor Office; WHEELING POLICE DEPARTMENT,
No. 10-1293
WILLIAM CRISWELL; REBECCA RANDOLPH; JOHN DOE, 1, individually and collectively,
MAIN STREET BANK; UNITED BANK, d/b/a United National Bank; UNITED BANK – DUNBAR, d/b/a United National Bank; ROSELYN J. CANTINI, United Bank; OHIO COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA, Ohio County Prosecutor Office; WHEELING POLICE DEPARTMENT,
No. 10-1325
WILLIAM CRISWELL; REBECCA RANDOLPH; JOHN DOE, 1, individually and collectively,
2 and
MAIN STREET BANK; UNITED BANK, d/b/a United National Bank; UNITED BANK – DUNBAR, d/b/a United National Bank; ROSELYN J. CANTINI, United Bank; OHIO COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA, Ohio County Prosecutor Office; WHEELING POLICE DEPARTMENT,
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:08-cv-00025-FPS-JSK)
Submitted: May 20, 2010 Decided: July 21, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Greg Givens, Appellant Pro Se. Lee Murray Hall, JENKINS FENSTERMAKER, PLLC, Huntington, West Virginia; Keith C. Gamble, PULLIN, FOWLER, FLANAGAN, BROWN & POE, PLLC, Morgantown, West Virginia; James Thomas McClure, GOMPERS, MCCARTHY & MCCLURE, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3 PER CURIAM:
Greg Givens seeks to appeal various district court
orders in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) case. This court may
exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291
(2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial
Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The orders
Givens seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable
interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeals for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Givens’ motion to
strike and dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Givens v. Criswell (Givens v. Criswell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.