Givens v. Cerliano
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 6:20-cv-00508 Henry Lee Givens, Plaintiff, V. Maxey Cerliano, Defendant.
ORDER This civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3). The magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation that Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis be denied, and the case be dismissed, with prejudice, for pur- poses of proceeding in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Doc. 4. The magistrate judge further recommended that if plain- tiff pays the full filing fee within fifteen days of the date of the dismissal order, the lawsuit would proceed as though the full filing fee had been paid from the outset. Doc. 4. As of the date of this order, plaintiff has not objected to the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations. Douglass v. United States Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc). Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s report, and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommendation. The court orders that plain- tiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) is denied. Plaintiff’s civil action is dismissed with prejudice for purposes of proceeding in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
So ordered by the court on December 21, 2020.
J “CAMPBELL BARKER United States District Judge
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Givens v. Cerliano (Givens v. Cerliano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.