Givatowsky v. National City Bank
This text of 258 A.D. 956 (Givatowsky v. National City Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the respondent, The National City Bank of New York, with leave to the plaintiff to renew the application to suppress the deposition at the commencement of the trial if the cross-interrogatories are not answered and the complete deposition returned before such time. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
258 A.D. 956, 17 N.Y.S.2d 871, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/givatowsky-v-national-city-bank-nyappdiv-1940.