Givatowsky v. National City Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Givatowsky v. National City Bank

246 A.D. 798

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Givatowsky v. National City Bank. Read the opinion of the Court — 240 A.D. 1020 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1935·Published

Opinion

Order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment as to the second cause of action unanimously affirmed, with twenty • dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. The second cause of action is based on an equitable assignment by the Russo-Asiatic Bank to plaintiff of a part of the credit balance of its account with the head office of the National City Bank of New York. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment as to the second cause of action unanimously affirmed, with twenty • dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. The second cause of action is based on an equitable assignment by the Russo-Asiatic Bank to plaintiff of a part of the credit balance of its account with the head office of the National City Bank of New York. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.

Givatowsky v. National City Bank, 246 A.D. 798 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

246 A.D. 798 (Givatowsky v. National City Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.