Giuseppe Maturo v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Second Circuit

Giuseppe Maturo v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

404 F.2d 337

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedDecember 11, 1968

Docket32588_1

StatusPublished

This text of 404 F.2d 337 (Giuseppe Maturo v. Immigration and Naturalization Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Giuseppe Maturo v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 404 F.2d 337 (2d Cir. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

404 F.2d 337

Giuseppe MATURO, Petitioner,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 168, Docket 32588.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued Nov. 8, 1968.
Decided Dec. 11, 1968.

John A. Arcudi, Bridgeport, Conn., for petitioner.

Daniel Riesel, Sp. Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City (Robert M. Morgenthau, U.S. Atty., for the Southern District of New York, New York City, on the brief), for respondent.

Before MEDINA and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges, and LEVET, District judge.1

PER CURIAM:

Petitioner was found deportable at a hearing conducted on July 8, 1965. He has remained in this country, however, by resorting to various procedural expedients. He now seeks to reopen his deporation hearing in order to obtain status as a permanent resident. Both the Special Inquiry Officer and the Board of Immigration Appeals denied his motion because he was statutorily ineligible as there were no immigrant visas immediately available or likely to become so in the near future. See 8 U.S.C. Section 1255. We agree. Moreover, the record is absolutely barren of any evidence or facts to support petitioner's claim that this determination was an abuse of discretion because others similarly situated have been allowed to remain.

The petition to review is denied and the statutory stay is vacated.

1

Of the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

404 F.2d 337

Giuseppe MATURO, Petitioner,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 168, Docket 32588.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued Nov. 8, 1968.
Decided Dec. 11, 1968.

John A. Arcudi, Bridgeport, Conn., for petitioner.

Daniel Riesel, Sp. Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City (Robert M. Morgenthau, U.S. Atty., for the Southern District of New York, New York City, on the brief), for respondent.

Before MEDINA and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges, and LEVET, District judge.1

PER CURIAM:

Petitioner was found deportable at a hearing conducted on July 8, 1965. He has remained in this country, however, by resorting to various procedural expedients. He now seeks to reopen his deporation hearing in order to obtain status as a permanent resident. Both the Special Inquiry Officer and the Board of Immigration Appeals denied his motion because he was statutorily ineligible as there were no immigrant visas immediately available or likely to become so in the near future. See 8 U.S.C. Section 1255. We agree. Moreover, the record is absolutely barren of any evidence or facts to support petitioner's claim that this determination was an abuse of discretion because others similarly situated have been allowed to remain.

The petition to review is denied and the statutory stay is vacated.

1

Of the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

404 F.2d 337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/giuseppe-maturo-v-immigration-and-naturalization-service-ca2-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack