Giurlani v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Giurlani v. United States

60 Cust. Ct. 209, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2556

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedFebruary 28, 1968

DocketC.D. 3320

StatusPublished

This text of 60 Cust. Ct. 209 (Giurlani v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Giurlani v. United States, 60 Cust. Ct. 209, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2556 (cusc 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Richardson, Judge:

Upon the calendar call counsel for the Government moved for a dismissal of the instant protests on the ground that increased duties had not been paid. Counsel for the importer having conceded that such duties had not been paid, the trial court ordered the protests dismissed.

The protests herein are, therefore, dismissed for nonpayment of increased duties, and judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richardson, Judge:

Upon the calendar call counsel for the Government moved for a dismissal of the instant protests on the ground that increased duties had not been paid. Counsel for the importer having conceded that such duties had not been paid, the trial court ordered the protests dismissed.

The protests herein are, therefore, dismissed for nonpayment of increased duties, and judgment will be entered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 Cust. Ct. 209, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/giurlani-v-united-states-cusc-1968.