Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Giulini v. Gurahian

Giulini v. Gurahian

154 A.D.2d 465, 547 N.Y.S.2d 232, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12460
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 10, 1989
StatusPublished

This text of 154 A.D.2d 465 (Giulini v. Gurahian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Giulini v. Gurahian, 154 A.D.2d 465, 547 N.Y.S.2d 232, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12460 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to prohibit the respondents from holding the petitioner in contempt of court on the ground that personal jurisdiction was never obtained.

Adjudged that the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

The extraordinary remedy of prohibition does not properly lie under the instant circumstances in view of the apparent lack of merit of the petitioner’s contentions and the availability of an adequate remedy at law (see, Matter of Lipari v Owens, 70 NY2d 731; Matter of Molea v Marasco, 64 NY2d 718). Lawrence, J. P., Rubin, Balletta and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Molea v. Marasco
475 N.E.2d 109 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
Lipari v. Owens
514 N.E.2d 378 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
154 A.D.2d 465, 547 N.Y.S.2d 232, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/giulini-v-gurahian-nyappdiv-1989.