Giuliano v. United States

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 9, 2011
Docket10-7625
StatusUnpublished

This text of Giuliano v. United States (Giuliano v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Giuliano v. United States, (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7625

IGNATZIO GIULIANO,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; WARDEN FCI WILLIAMSBURG,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (6:10-cv-02485-MBS)

Submitted: February 28, 2011 Decided: March 9, 2011

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ignatzio Giuliano, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Ignatzio Giuliano, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the

magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241

(West 2006 & Supp. 2010) petition. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Giuliano v. Warden, No.

6:10-cv-02485-MBS (D.S.C. Nov. 8, 2010). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Giuliano v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/giuliano-v-united-states-ca4-2011.