Giuliano v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Giuliano v. United States

415 F. App'x 482

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 9, 2011·No. No. 10-7625·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Ignatzio Giuliano, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2010) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Giuliano v. Warden, No. 6:10-cv-02485-MBS, 2010 WL 4637771 (D.S.C. Nov. 8, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Ignatzio Giuliano, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2010) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Giuliano v. Warden, No. 6:10-cv-02485-MBS, 2010 WL 4637771 (D.S.C. Nov. 8, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Giuliano v. United States, 415 F. App'x 482 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

415 F. App'x 482 (Giuliano v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related