Giuliano v. Giuliano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Giuliano v. Giuliano

278 A.D. 850, 104 N.Y.S.2d 604, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4969

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 21, 1951·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Appeal by respondent husband from an order of the Domestic Relations Court of the City of New York, County of Richmond, Family Court Division, which denies his motion to dismiss a petition and continues in effect an order of that court previously made, directing him to support his wife. Appellant, by his notice of appeal, sought to bring up for review the support order, previously made, from which no appeal had been taken. Appeal dismissed, without costs. There is no warrant in law for a review of the order directing support, by the procedure adopted by appellant (cf. Civ. Prae. Act, § 580), and the order appealed from is not appealable, since it is neither a final order or judgment (N. Y. City Dom. Rel. Ct. Act, § 58; cf. Van Arsdale v. King, 155 N. Y. 325; McGovern v. Manhattan By. Co., 112 App. Div. 184; Matter of Small, 158 N. Y. 128, and Hammond v. National Life Assn., 168 N. Y. 262). Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and MacCrate, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by respondent husband from an order of the Domestic Relations Court of the City of New York, County of Richmond, Family Court Division, which denies his motion to dismiss a petition and continues in effect an order of that court previously made, directing him to support his wife. Appellant, by his notice of appeal, sought to bring up for review the support order, previously made, from which no appeal had been taken. Appeal dismissed, without costs. There is no warrant in law for a review of the order directing support, by the procedure adopted by appellant (cf. Civ. Prae. Act, § 580), and the order appealed from is not appealable, since it is neither a final order or judgment (N. Y. City Dom. Rel. Ct. Act, § 58; cf. Van Arsdale v. King, 155 N. Y. 325; McGovern v. Manhattan By. Co., 112 App. Div. 184; Matter of Small, 158 N. Y. 128, and Hammond v. National Life Assn., 168 N. Y. 262). Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and MacCrate, JJ.

Giuliano v. Giuliano, 278 A.D. 850, 104 N.Y.S.2d 604, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4969 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).

Pincite

278 A.D. 850 (Giuliano v. Giuliano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related