Giuffrida v. City of St. Louis

253 S.W.3d 584, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 705, 2008 WL 2098103
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 20, 2008·No. No. ED 90083·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

A1 Giuffrida, Jr., Pasadena, LLC, and Ozark Leasing, LLC (collectively Petitioners) appeal from the trial court’s judgment affirming an order of the Board of Building Appeals of the City of St. Louis upholding a Notice of Condemnation for Occupancy issued by the City of St. Louis Department of Public Safety, Division of Building and Inspection, condemning property owned by Petitioners.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Giuffrida v. City of St. Louis, 253 S.W.3d 584, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 705, 2008 WL 2098103 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

253 S.W.3d 584 (Giuffrida v. City of St. Louis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.