Giuffre v. Prince Andrew

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided January 18, 2022·No. 1:21-cv-06702·Unknown

Opinion

USDS SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY □□□□ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: DATE FILED: □ □□□□□□□□□ VIRGINIA GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, CASE NO: 1:21-cv-06702-LAK

v. PRINCE ANDREW, DUKE OF YORK, alk/fa ANDREW ALBERT CHRISTIAN EDWARD, in his personal capacity Defendant.

STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER Plaintiff Virginia Giuffre and Defendant Prince Andrew request that this Court issue a protective order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) to protect the confidentiality of nonpublic and sensitive information that they may need to disclose in connection with discovery in this action; WHEREAS, in the interest of facilitating the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of the above-captioned matter, and in the interest of protecting the legitimate interests of the parties in maintaining the confidentiality of certain information to be disclosed during the discovery process: IT 1S HEREBY AGREED as follows: The Parties to this action, their respective agents, employees, and attorneys, any other person in active concert or participation with any of the foregoing, and all other persons with actual notice of this Order will adhere to the following terms, upon pain of contempt:

lee This Stipulation is being entered into to facilitate the production, exchange, and discovery of documents and information that the Parties, and as appropriate, nonparties, agree merit confidential treatment (hereinafter the “Discovery Material”). It is the intent of the Parties that information will not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing will be so designated unless it is highly sensitive information and there is a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part of the public record of this case. 2, Nothing in this Stipulated Confidentiality Agreement and Protective Order shall be interpreted or construed as changing any burden of proof or persuasion with respect to any confidentiality designation or burden with respect to any sealing request. ay “Producing Party” shall mean the parties to this action and any third parties producing Confidential Information. 4, “Receiving Party” shall mean the party to this action and/or any non-party receiving Confidential Information. Lachobes eis Cort ag DeCureR wk □□□□□ A

5. With respect to “Discovery Material” (i.e., documents, information or tangible things of any kind produced or disclosed in the course of discovery in this action) that a Producing Party has designated as éContidential” pursuant to this Order, no Receiving Party may disclose such Confidential Discovery Material to anyone else except as expressly permitted hereunder. 6. The Producing Party may designate as Confidential only the portion of such material that it reasonably and in good faith believes consists of: (a) medical, mental health and/or other health care records;

(b) Social Security numbers, personal telephone numbers, tax returns, and credit and banking information of any person: (c) names of alleged minor victims of sexual abuse; (d) extracts and summaries of any information identified in (a)-(c) (e) any other category of information given confidential status by this Court after the date of this Order. i With respect to the Confidential portion of any Discovery Material other than deposition transcripts and exhibits, the Producing Party or its counsel may designate such portion as “Confidential” by: (a) stamping or otherwise clearly marking as “Confidential” the protected portion in a manner that will not interfere with legibility or audibility; and (b) producing for future public use another copy of said Discovery Material with the confidential information redacted. 8. A Producing Party or its counsel may designate deposition exhibits or portions of deposition transcripts as Confidential Discovery Material either by: (a) indicating on the record during the deposition that a question calls for Confidential information, in which case the reporter will bind the transcript of the designated testimony in a separate volume and mark it as “Confidential Information Governed by Protective Order;” or (b) notifying the reporter and all counsel of record, in writing, within 30 days after a deposition has concluded, of the specific pages and lines of the transcript that are to be designated “Confidential,” in which case all counsel receiving the transcript will be responsible for marking the copies of the designated transcript in their possession or under their control as directed by the Producing Party or that person’s counsel. During the 30-day period following a deposition, all Parties will treat the entire deposition transcript as if it had been designated Confidential. If at any time before the

termination of this action a Producing Party realizes that it should have designated as Confidential some portion(s) of Discovery Material that it previously produced without limitation, the Producing Party may so designate such material by notifying all Parties in writing. Thereafter, the Receiving Party will treat such designated portion(s} of the Discovery Material as Confidential. In addition, the Producing Party shall provide each Receiving Party with replacement versions of such Discovery Material that bears the “Confidential” desi gnation within two business days of providing such notice. 9. Nothing contained in this Order will be construed as: (a) a waiver by a Party or

person of its right to object to any discovery request; (b) a waiver of any privilege or protection; or (c) a ruling regarding the admissibility at trial of any document, testimony, or other evidence. 10. Where a Producing Party has designated Discovery Material as Confidential, the Receiving Party may disclose such information only to the following persons: (a) the Parties to this action; (b) counsel retained specifically for this action, including any paralegal, clerical, or other assistant that such outside counse! employs and assigns to this matter: (c) outside vendors or service providers (such as copy-service providers and document-management consultants) that counsel hire and assign to this matter, provided such person has first executed a Non-Disclosure Agreement in the form annexed as Exhibit A hereto; (d) any mediator or arbitrator that the Parties engage in this matter or that this Court appoints, provided such person has first executed a Non-Disclosure Agreement in the form annexed as Exhibit A hereto;

(e) as to any document, its author, its addressee, and any other person indicated on the face of the document as having received a copy; (f} any witness who counsel for a Party in good faith believes may be called to testify at trial or deposition in this action, provided such person has first executed a Non-Disclosure Agreement in the form annexed as Exhibit A hereto; (g) any person a Party retains to serve as an expert witness or otherwise provide specialized advice to counsel in connection with this action, provided such person has first executed a Non-Disclosure Agreement in the form annexed as Exhibit A hereto; (h) stenographers engaged to transcribe depositions the Parties conduct in this action; and (i) this Court, including any appellate court, its support personnel, and court reporters. ll.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Giuffre v. Prince Andrew, (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Giuffre v. Prince Andrew (Giuffre v. Prince Andrew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)