Giuffre v. Maxwell

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided March 31, 2020·No. 1:15-cv-07433·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, v. No. 15-cv-07433-LAP GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant.

Order and Protocol for Unsealing Decided Motions

The Court previously ruled that “only motions actually decided by Judge Sweet—along with documents relevant to Judge Sweet’s decisions on those motions—are properly considered judicial documents to which a presumption of public access attaches.” Order, dated Dec. 16, 2019 (DE 1016). Such materials are referred to herein as the “Sealed Materials” or “Sealed Items.” The Sealed Materials will be enumerated in a List of Decided Motions designated by the Court . In accordance with Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41, 49-51 (2d Cir. 2019), the Court will conduct an individualized review of each Sealed Item in the List of Decided Motions to determine (a) the weight of presumption of public access that should be afforded to the document, (b) the identification and weight of any countervailing interests supporting continued sealing/redaction, and (c) whether the countervailing interests rebut the presumption of public access. To assist in this process and afford persons identified or otherwise interested in the Sealed Materials the opportunity to participate in the Court’s individualized review, the Court adopts the following protocol. 1. Non-Parties List: Plaintiff Virginia Giuffre and Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell (collectively, the “Original Parties”) each have submitted under seal a list of non-parties whose privacy, reputational or other interests may be implicated by the unsealing of the Sealed Materials (each, a “Non-Party,” and collectively, the “Non-Parties”). Because the Original Parties did not agree on one or more Non-Parties to be included in the list, the Court has resolved all such disagreements and shall issue to the Original Parties a Court-approved Non-Parties List, which shall be sealed. The Non-Parties shall include but are not limited to: (a) persons who produced or answered discovery based upon the representation or understanding that the discovery would be subject to the Protective Order previously issued in this action; (b) persons who are identified as having allegedly engaged in sexual acts with Plaintiff, or other alleged victims, or allegedly facilitated such acts; (c) persons whose intimate, sexual, or private conduct is described in the Sealed Materials; and (d) persons who are alleged to have been victimized. The Non-Parties List will: • Identify each Non-Party by his or her name, which correlates to a unique pseudonymous identifier, i.e., Doe #1, Doe #2, and Doe #3. • Provide the address or contact information for each Non-Party or his or her legal counsel, which the Original Parties identified to the best of their ability. 2. Judicial Adjudication: Because of the volume of Sealed Materials, the Court will conduct an individualized review of several Sealed Items at a time, thereby allowing the review to proceed on a rolling basis and in a manageable fashion. The Court will review sealed items based on the Non-Party mentioned in the Sealed Materials. For example, for Doe #1, the Court would review each Sealed Item that mentions Doe #1, and would do the same for Does #2, #3, etc. This will allow the Court more easily to manage and review any objections from Non- Parties. The following procedure shall be used for each set of Sealed Items reviewed by the Court: a. The Court will notify the parties via minute order (“Notification”) of the set of Sealed Items that will be considered. The Court will consider input from the Original Parties as to the number of Sealed Items that is appropriate to consider at once in light of the volume and complexity of the Sealed Items. b. As soon as practicable after the Notification the Original Parties shall confer and shall use their best efforts to cause each Non-Party mentioned in the Sealed Materials to be considered to be served confidentially with the Non-Party Notice. The Non-Party Notice is attached hereto and has been approved by the Court. “Best efforts” entails identifying the most current address available for the nonparty in a public records database or other readily available source. Service shall be effected via first class certified mail, return receipt requested. After service, the party causing the service shall file a certificate of service, stating the date and method of service and identifying the Non-Party by his or her pseudonymous identifier. c. Within 14 days of service of the Non-Party Notice, a Non-Party, identified by his or her pseudonymous identifier, may submit to the Court a request for excerpts of the Sealed Materials pertaining to him or her (the “Excerpts”). The form request attached hereto has been approved by the Court and shall be attached to the Non-Party Notice. The request shall be faxed, mailed, or e-mailed1 to the Court and served upon counsel for the Original Parties. Upon receipt of the request, the Original Parties shall confer and cause the Excerpts to be served via U.S. mail or e-mail, as requested by the Non-Party, promptly on the requesting Non-Party. d. Within 14 days of service of the Excerpts, the Non-Party may submit to the Court an objection to unsealing/unredacting (“Non-Party Objection”). The form Non-

1 The Court may be reached by email at PreskaNYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov. Party Objection attached hereto has been approved by the Court and shall be attached to the Non-Party Notice. The Non-Party Notice will require any objecting Non-Party to state briefly the reasons for the objection and identify any countervailing interest that militates against unsealing, if applicable. A Non-Party may also submit a memorandum of law in support of the Non-Party Objection. The Non-Party Objection and any accompanying memorandum shall be served on the Original Parties. Within 14 days of service of any Non-Party Objection and accompanying memorandum, if any, the Original Parties may file an opposition stating the reasons why any Sealed Item should be unsealed. The opposition shall be served on the objecting Non-Party. The objecting Non-Party may file a reply in support of its objection within 7 days of service of the Original Parties’ opposition. e. Within 14 days of service of any Non-Party Objection, any Original Party may file its own objection to unsealing/unredacting (“Party Objection”), and an accompanying memorandum of law in support of the objection. Any opposition to the Party Objection shall be filed within 14 days. The objecting Original Party may file a reply in support of his or her objection within 7 days of service of any opposition. f. If within 14 days of the Notification no Non-Party has requested Excerpts, the Original Parties shall have 14 days from the date on which the Non-Party’s time to object expires to submit an objection to unsealing and an accompanying memorandum. Any opposition to such an objection shall be filed within 14 days. The objecting Party may then file a reply within 7 days of service in support of his or her objection. g. Any memorandum in support of a Non-Party or Party Objection to unsealing a particular Sealed Item shall be no longer than 6 double-spaced pages in 12 point, Times New Roman font. Any memorandum in opposition to a Non-Party or Party Objection shall also be no longer than 6 double-spaced pages in 12 point, Times New Roman font. Any reply in further support of a Non-Party or Party Objection may be no longer than 4 double-spaced pages in 12 point, Times New Roman font. h. An order from this Court unsealing a Sealed Item, in whole or in part, as to a Non-Party should be deemed to have affected the Non-Party’s rights and interests for purposes of an appeal. i.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Giuffre v. Maxwell, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Giuffre v. Maxwell (Giuffre v. Maxwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. Maxwell Dershowitz v. Giuffre
929 F.3d 41 (Second Circuit, 2019)