Gitzis v. Baily-Schiffman

114 A.D.3d 787, 979 N.Y.S.2d 852
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 13, 2014
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 114 A.D.3d 787 (Gitzis v. Baily-Schiffman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gitzis v. Baily-Schiffman, 114 A.D.3d 787, 979 N.Y.S.2d 852 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondent Loren Baily-Schiffman, an Acting Justice of the Supreme Court, Kings County, to determine the petitioner’s motion to dismiss the underlying proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law article 81, pending in the Supreme Court, Kings County, under index No. 100038/13, for the appointment of a guardian of his personal needs and property management.

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act and only when there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought (see Matter of Legal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County v Scheinman, 53 NY2d 12, 16 [1981]). The petitioner commenced this proceeding for a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent Loren Baily-Schiffman, an Acting Justice of the Supreme Court, to determine his motion [788]*788to dismiss the petition in the underlying guardianship proceeding. Since the instant proceeding was commenced prior to the full submission of the motion (see CPLR 2219), the proceeding is premature (see Matter of Weaver v Vaughan, 72 AD3d 695 [2010]; Matter of Goldman v Seidell, 234 AD2d 547 [1996]), and the petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Eng, EJ., Rivera, Leventhal and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Miller v. Foley
2016 NY Slip Op 8866 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 A.D.3d 787, 979 N.Y.S.2d 852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gitzis-v-baily-schiffman-nyappdiv-2014.