Gitzendanner-Muller Co. v. Cherouny Printing & Publishing Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Gitzendanner-Muller Co. v. Cherouny Printing & Publishing Co.

149 N.Y.S. 485

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedOctober 27, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 149 N.Y.S. 485 (Gitzendanner-Muller Co. v. Cherouny Printing & Publishing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gitzendanner-Muller Co. v. Cherouny Printing & Publishing Co., 149 N.Y.S. 485 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

SEABURY, J.

The action is for services performed and materials furnished. The defendant alleged a counterclaim, predicated upon the contention that the plaintiff agreed to' reset certain machinery and performed work under this agreement so negligently that the floor of the defendant’s premises gave way, causing the defendant damages in the sum of $1,500. The plaintiff sought a bill of particulars as specified in the demand served. The bill which the defendant furnished was inadequate. The plaintiff was entitled to have the particulars specified in the demand served.

Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with $10 costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SEABURY, J.

The action is for services performed and materials furnished. The defendant alleged a counterclaim, predicated upon the contention that the plaintiff agreed to' reset certain machinery and performed work under this agreement so negligently that the floor of the defendant’s premises gave way, causing the defendant damages in the sum of $1,500. The plaintiff sought a bill of particulars as specified in the demand served. The bill which the defendant furnished was inadequate. The plaintiff was entitled to have the particulars specified in the demand served.

Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with $10 costs. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

149 N.Y.S. 485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gitzendanner-muller-co-v-cherouny-printing-publishing-co-nyappterm-1914.