Gittens v. South Carolina

Fourth Circuit

Gittens v. South Carolina

633 F. App'x 840

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 29, 2016·No. Nos. 15-2206, 15-2294·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jamaal Gittens appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaints. We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gittens v. South Carolina, No. 3:15-cv-02841-MGL (D.S.C. Sept. 30, 2015); Gittens v. South Carolina, No. 6:15-cv-03108-MGL (D.S.C. Oct. 8, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before [841] this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jamaal Gittens appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaints. We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gittens v. South Carolina, No. 3:15-cv-02841-MGL (D.S.C. Sept. 30, 2015); Gittens v. South Carolina, No. 6:15-cv-03108-MGL (D.S.C. Oct. 8, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before [841] this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Gittens v. South Carolina, 633 F. App'x 840 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

633 F. App'x 840 (Gittens v. South Carolina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related