Gist v. Duracell Inc. Managed Disability Plan
This text of 158 F. App'x 490 (Gist v. Duracell Inc. Managed Disability Plan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Betty Gist appeals the district court’s order dismissing her action seeking long term disability benefits under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Gist v. Duracell Inc. Managed Disability Plan, No. CA-04-882-0-JFA (D.S.C. filed July 7, 2005 & entered July 13, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
158 F. App'x 490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gist-v-duracell-inc-managed-disability-plan-ca4-2005.