Gisler v. K-Mart Corp.

706 So. 2d 949, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2483, 1998 WL 107301
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 13, 1998·No. No. 97-2575·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this premises liability ease,- the trial court entered an order . vacating the jury verdict in favor of -appellants and directing a verdict for appellee K-Mart. The trial court correctly concluded that appellants failed to adduce evidence upon which K-Mart could be charged with constructive notice of the substance upon which appellant Ruth Gisler slipped and fell. Without indicia of constructive notice the jury verdict in appellants’ favor was “sheer speculation.” See Broz v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., 546 So.2d 83 (Fla 3d DCA 1989); Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. [950]*950Marcotte, 553 So.2d 213, 215 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).

AFFIRMED.

MINER, KAHN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gisler v. K-Mart Corp., 706 So. 2d 949, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2483, 1998 WL 107301 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

706 So. 2d 949 (Gisler v. K-Mart Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Marcotte
553 So. 2d 213 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Broz v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.
546 So. 2d 83 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)