Gisclair v. Social Security Administration

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

JAMIE GISCLAIR CIVIL ACTION

VERSUS NO. 24-1298

SOCIAL SECURITY SECTION “R” (5) ADMINISTRATION

ORDER AND REASONS Before the Court is Plaintiff’s action for review of a final decision of the Acting Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiff’s claim for disability insurance benefits. On July 14, 2025, Chief Magistrate Judge North issued an R&R, recommending that the Court dismiss Plaintiff’s case with prejudice.1 Plaintiff did not object to the R&R. Therefore, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), superseded by statute on other grounds, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee’s note (1983) (“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.”). The Court finds no clear error. Accordingly, the Court adopts the Magistrate Judge’s R&R as its opinion. The Court REJECTS Plaintiff’s brief,

1 R. Doc. 17. ADOPTS Commissioner’s brief, and DISMISSES Plaintiffs case WITH PREJUDICE.

New Orleans, Louisiana, this__4th _ day of August, 2025.

ernk Varner SARAH S. VANCE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE