Gischer v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Gischer v. State

791 S.W.2d 470, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 898, 1990 WL 79027

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 12, 1990·No. No. 57080·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

ORDER

Appellant, Edward Gischer, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed appellant’s allegation of error and the entire record upon which it is based. Since we do not find the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law to be clearly erroneous and since we find that an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the court’s denial of appellant’s motion pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been provided a memorandum, solely for their information, which sets forth the basis of our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

ORDER

Appellant, Edward Gischer, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed appellant’s allegation of error and the entire record upon which it is based. Since we do not find the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law to be clearly erroneous and since we find that an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the court’s denial of appellant’s motion pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been provided a memorandum, solely for their information, which sets forth the basis of our decision.

Gischer v. State, 791 S.W.2d 470, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 898, 1990 WL 79027 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

791 S.W.2d 470 (Gischer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.