Girtman v. Preiser

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Girtman v. Preiser

51 A.D.2d 968, 380 N.Y.S.2d 295, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11695

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 1, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 51 A.D.2d 968 (Girtman v. Preiser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Girtman v. Preiser, 51 A.D.2d 968, 380 N.Y.S.2d 295, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11695 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel respondent to credit him with certain jail time, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated February 6, 1976, which, after a hearing, dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Petitioner is not entitled to any jail time credit against his previously imposed indeterminate sentence, upon which he had been conditionally released, for the jail time served in full satisfaction of a subsequent definite sentence (see Penal Law, § 70.40, subd 3, pars [b], [c]; cf. People ex rel. Petite v Follette, 24 NY2d 60; Matter of Al Sabaa [Cyril Morgan] v Casscles, 43 AD2d 990, affd 36 NY2d 722). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Rabin and Titone, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel respondent to credit him with certain jail time, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated February 6, 1976, which, after a hearing, dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Petitioner is not entitled to any jail time credit against his previously imposed indeterminate sentence, upon which he had been conditionally released, for the jail time served in full satisfaction of a subsequent definite sentence (see Penal Law, § 70.40, subd 3, pars [b], [c]; cf. People ex rel. Petite v Follette, 24 NY2d 60; Matter of Al Sabaa [Cyril Morgan] v Casscles, 43 AD2d 990, affd 36 NY2d 722). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Rabin and Titone, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A.D.2d 968, 380 N.Y.S.2d 295, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/girtman-v-preiser-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack