Giroux v. General Council Agency

13 Am. Tribal Law 244
CourtHo-Chunk Nation Supreme Court
DecidedMay 17, 2016
DocketNos. SU 16-02
StatusPublished

This text of 13 Am. Tribal Law 244 (Giroux v. General Council Agency) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ho-Chunk Nation Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Giroux v. General Council Agency, 13 Am. Tribal Law 244 (hochunk 2016).

Opinion

ORDER (Granting Appellant’s Motion to Withdraw Petition)

PER CURIAM.

ORDER

The appellant filed a Motion to Withdraw Petition on Friday, May 6, 2016, seeking to withdraw her Petition for Permission to Stay Trial, which has since concluded. See HCN R. App. P. 8, available at http://www.ho-chunknation.com/ government/judiciary/judicial-rules.aspx. In the April 29, 2016 Petition, the appellant failed to request a stay pursuant to [245]*245HCN R. App. P. 7(c) of that portion of the interim judgment that set trial. Therefore, this Court appropriately denied appellant’s interlocutory request due to the deficiency and awaited the appellee’s answer before addressing the substantive merits of the appeal. Id., Rule 8; see also Decision (Declining to Delay Trial & Granting Appellant’s Pet. To Waive Filing Fee & Costs); SU 16-02 (HCN S.Ct., May 2, 2016). The Court now grants appellant’s Motion to Withdraw Petition.

MOTION GRANTED.

EGI HESKEKJET.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 Am. Tribal Law 244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/giroux-v-general-council-agency-hochunk-2016.