Girish Modi v. Aarti Pandya AKA Arati Pandya

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 26, 2018·No. A19D0065·Published

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ September 14, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19D0065. GIRISH MODI v. AARTI PANDYA AKA ARATI PANDYA.

On June 27, 2018, the trial court dismissed with prejudice Girish Modi’s action against Aarti Pandya, M. D., and Aarti Pandya, M. D., P. C. Thereafter, Modi filed a motion for reconsideration, which the trial court denied. On August 21, 2018, Modi filed this application for discretionary review, seeking to appeal the trial court’s orders. Modi also filed two identical motions to sanction opposing counsel, alleging that counsel made various misstatements to the trial court. See Court of Appeals Rule 7. We, however, lack jurisdiction over this application. To be timely, a discretionary application must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). This statutory deadline is jurisdictional, and we cannot accept an application for appeal not made in compliance with OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). Boyle v. State, 190 Ga. App. 734, 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989). Here, Modi filed his application 55 days after entry of the dismissal order. Although he filed a motion for reconsideration, the denial of a motion for reconsideration of an appealable order or judgment is not itself appealable and does not extend the time for filing a notice of appeal or an application for appeal. See Bell v. Cohran, 244 Ga. App. 510, 511 (536 SE2d 187) (2000); Savage v. Newsome, 173 Ga. App. 271, 271 (326 SE2d 5) (1985). Thus, Modi’s application is untimely as to the dismissal order and invalid as to the order denying reconsideration. Accordingly, the application is hereby DISMISSED. Modi’s motions for sanctions are hereby DENIED. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 09/14/2018 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Girish Modi v. Aarti Pandya AKA Arati Pandya, (Ga. Ct. App. 2018).

Girish Modi v. Aarti Pandya AKA Arati Pandya (Girish Modi v. Aarti Pandya AKA Arati Pandya) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boyle v. State of Georgia
380 S.E.2d 57 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1989)
Bell v. Cohran
536 S.E.2d 187 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2000)
Savage v. Newsome
326 S.E.2d 5 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1985)