Girards v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Girards v. Board of Education

49 A.D.2d 878, 374 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11086

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 6, 1975

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 49 A.D.2d 878 (Girards v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Girards v. Board of Education, 49 A.D.2d 878, 374 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11086 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (1) to review a determination of the respondent board of education, made September 26, 1973, which terminated petitioner’s services as a probationary teacher and (2) to compel her reinstatement, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated June 7, 1974, which denied the application and dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed, without costs (see Matter of Anderson v Board of Educ. of City of Yonkers, 46 AD2d 360). Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham and Brennan, JJ., concur; Margett and Shapiro, JJ., concur and vote to affirm on [879]*879constraint of Matter of Anderson v Board of Educ. of City of Yonkers (46 AD2d 360); Shapiro, J., adhering to the views expressed in his dissenting memorandum therein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (1) to review a determination of the respondent board of education, made September 26, 1973, which terminated petitioner’s services as a probationary teacher and (2) to compel her reinstatement, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated June 7, 1974, which denied the application and dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed, without costs (see Matter of Anderson v Board of Educ. of City of Yonkers, 46 AD2d 360). Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham and Brennan, JJ., concur; Margett and Shapiro, JJ., concur and vote to affirm on [879]*879constraint of Matter of Anderson v Board of Educ. of City of Yonkers (46 AD2d 360); Shapiro, J., adhering to the views expressed in his dissenting memorandum therein.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 A.D.2d 878, 374 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11086, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/girards-v-board-of-education-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack