Girards v. Board of Education
359 N.E.2d 1368, 40 N.Y.2d 1020, 391 N.Y.S.2d 574, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3154
Opinion
Order affirmed, without costs (Matter of Anderson v Board of Educ., 38 NY2d 897). There is nothing in this record to suggest that appellant’s probationary appointment was terminated for a constitutionally impermissible purpose or in violation of statutory proscription (James v Board of Educ., 37 NY2d 891, 892).
Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Girards v. Board of Education, 359 N.E.2d 1368, 40 N.Y.2d 1020, 391 N.Y.S.2d 574, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3154 (N.Y. 1976).
359 N.E.2d 1368 (Girards v. Board of Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Strax v. Rockland County Board of Cooperative Educational Services
257 A.D.2d 578 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Strax v. Rockland County Board
258 A.D.2d 578 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Merhige v. Copiague School District
76 A.D.2d 926 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)