Girards v. Board of Education
This text of 359 N.E.2d 1368 (Girards v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, without costs (Matter of Anderson v Board of Educ., 38 NY2d 897). There is nothing in this record to suggest that appellant’s probationary appointment was terminated for a constitutionally impermissible purpose or in violation of statutory proscription (James v Board of Educ., 37 NY2d 891, 892).
Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
359 N.E.2d 1368, 40 N.Y.2d 1020, 391 N.Y.S.2d 574, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/girards-v-board-of-education-ny-1976.