Girardon v. Foa

286 A.D. 809, 141 N.Y.S.2d 586, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4184
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 14, 1955
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 286 A.D. 809 (Girardon v. Foa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Girardon v. Foa, 286 A.D. 809, 141 N.Y.S.2d 586, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4184 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

Opinion

In the present record, no reasonable excuse has been offered by plaintiff for the delay of some six years in prosecuting this action, nor has plaintiff set forth facts showing that he has a meritorious cause of action. The cross motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of prosecution should accordingly have been granted. Order unanimously reversed, the motion for permission to amend the complaint is denied and the cross motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution is granted without prejudice, however, to an application by plaintiff to vacate the order of dismissal upon a proper showing by affidavit of the reasons for the delay and submission of an affidavit of merits which should set forth in detail facts in support of his claim that he has a good cause of action. Settle order on notice. Concur — Peck, P. J., Cohn, Bastow, Botein and Rabin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. Bullock
17 A.D.2d 424 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
286 A.D. 809, 141 N.Y.S.2d 586, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/girardon-v-foa-nyappdiv-1955.