Girardon v. Foa

286 A.D. 809, 141 N.Y.S.2d 586, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4184
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 14, 1955·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In the present record, no reasonable excuse has been offered by plaintiff for the delay of some six years in prosecuting this action, nor has plaintiff set forth facts showing that he has a meritorious cause of action. The cross motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of prosecution should accordingly have been granted. Order unanimously reversed, the motion for permission to amend the complaint is denied and the cross motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution is granted without prejudice, however, to an application by plaintiff to vacate the order of dismissal upon a proper showing by affidavit of the reasons for the delay and submission of an affidavit of merits which should set forth in detail facts in support of his claim that he has a good cause of action. Settle order on notice. Concur — Peck, P. J., Cohn, Bastow, Botein and Rabin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Girardon v. Foa, 286 A.D. 809, 141 N.Y.S.2d 586, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4184 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

286 A.D. 809 (Girardon v. Foa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. Bullock
17 A.D.2d 424 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)