Girardi v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided November 24, 2025·No. 17-0181V·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 17-181V Filed: October 30, 2025

* * * * * * * * * * * * * NICOLE GIRARDI * * Petitioner, * * * v. * * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Mark Sadaka, Esq., Law Offices of Sadaka Associates, LLC, Englewood, NJ, for petitioner. Rachelle Bishop, Esq., US Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON PROFFER 1

Roth, Special Master:

On February 10, 2017, Angela and Joseph Girardi, as parents and guardians of their daughter Nicole, who was then a minor, filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. 2 On April 25, 2017, the case caption was amended to reflect that Nicole Girardi had come of age and was now petitioner. ECF No. 15. Petitioner alleges that the HPV vaccine she received on March 20, 2014, caused her to suffer, or in the alternative aggravated, a hemorrhagic optic nerve in her right eye, a swollen optic nerve, severe headaches, a large blind spot, and eye pain and fatigue. ECF No. 101, Proffer, filed October 30, 2025, at 1.

On September 27, 2024, the Court issued its Ruling on Entitlement, finding that petitioner’s HPV vaccination caused and/or triggered her optic neuritis. ECF No. 85. On October 30, 2025,

1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018).

1 respondent filed a proffer to which petitioner agreed, representing all elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled.

Respondent agrees to issue the following payment:

A lump sum of $110,000 in the form of an ACH deposit to petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to petitioner, Nicole Girardi. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 300aa-15(a).

I adopt the respondent’s proffer attached hereto, and award compensation in the amount and on the terms set forth therein. The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Mindy Michaels Roth Mindy Michaels Roth Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 Case 1:17-vv-00181-UNJ Document 101 Filed 10/30/25 Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ___________________________________ ) NICOLE GIRARDI, ) ) Petitioner, ) No. 17-181V (ECF) ) Special Master Roth v. ) ) SECRETARY OF HEALTH ) AND HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) ___________________________________ )

RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

On February 10, 2017, Angela and Joseph Girardi, as parents and guardians of their

daughter Nicole, who was then a minor, filed an amended petition for compensation under the

National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (“Vaccine Act” or

“Act”), alleging that Nicole’s receipt of a March 20, 2014 HPV vaccine caused her to suffer “a

hemorrhagic optic nerve in the right eye, a swollen optic nerve, severe headaches, a large blind

spot, eye pain and fatigue,” or in the alternative that the HPV vaccine significantly aggravated

the same conditions.1 On October 20, 2017, the Secretary of Health and Human Services

(“respondent”) filed a Rule 4(c) Report recommending against compensation. ECF No. 25. In

the ensuing years, the parties filed expert reports and the Court held a March 7, 2022 entitlement

hearing. ECF Nos. 28, 31-32, 41, 44-45, 72. On September 27, 2024, the Court issued a Ruling

on Entitlement finding petitioner entitled to compensation. ECF No. 85. Respondent proposes

the following proffer on award of compensation.

1 The petition initially was filed on February 7, 2017, with Nicole incorrectly identified as the petitioner. On April 25, 2017, the case caption was amended to reflect that Nicole Girardi (“petitioner”) had reached the age of majority. Case 1:17-vv-00181-UNJ Document 101 Filed 10/30/25 Page 2 of 3

I. Items of Compensation

A. Pain and Suffering

Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $110,000.00 in pain and suffering.

See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees.

This amount represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled under

42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.

II. Form of the Award

Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.

Respondent recommends that the Court’s decision and judgment award compensation as a lump

sum payment of $110,000.00, to be paid through an ACH deposit to petitioner’s counsel IOLTA

account for prompt disbursement to petitioner.2

Respectfully submitted,

BRETT A. SHUMATE Assistant Attorney General

C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Director Torts Branch, Civil Division

HEATHER L. PEARLMAN Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division

VORIS E. JOHNSON, JR. Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division

2 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future, unreimbursed expenses; future lost earnings; and future pain and suffering. 2 Case 1:17-vv-00181-UNJ Document 101 Filed 10/30/25 Page 3 of 3

/s/ Rachelle P. Bishop RACHELLE P. BISHOP Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 (202) 616-3662 Rachelle.P.Bishop@usdoj.gov DATED: October 30, 2025

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Girardi v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2025).

Girardi v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Girardi v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-1
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-1
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a