Girardi v. Laquin Lumber Co.

81 A. 63, 232 Pa. 1, 1911 Pa. LEXIS 664
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 17, 1911·No. Appeal, No. 72·Published·Cited by 58 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This appeal is from an order discharging a rule to amend the record by making new parties defendants after the statute of limitations had become a bar to a new action. The action was brought against the Laquin Lumber Company, a corporation. The amendment proposed was to name as defendants a partnership, composed of six persons, trading as the Laquin Lumber Company. The allowance of the amendment would have brought new parties on the record. Under the rule established by our cases this cannot be done. Where the statute of limitations has run, amendments will not be allowed which introduce a new cause of action or bring in a new party or change the capacity in which he is sued. If the effect of the amendment is to correct the name under which the right party is sued, it will be allowed; if it is to bring in a new party, it will be refused: Wright v. Copper Co., 206 Pa. 274.

The order discharging the rule is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Girardi v. Laquin Lumber Co., 81 A. 63, 232 Pa. 1, 1911 Pa. LEXIS 664 (Pa. 1911).

81 A. 63 (Girardi v. Laquin Lumber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Seneca Leandro View LLC v. Lycoming County TCB
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2021
Mastrian, J. v. Peoples, M.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2019
Weigner, D. v. Lan, Z.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2019
Abrams v. Pneumo Abex Corp.
981 A.2d 198 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2009)
Blaine v. York Financial Corp.
847 A.2d 727 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2004)
Miller v. Abraham
37 Pa. D. & C.4th 312 (Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas, 1997)
Zimmer v. Benchmark Management Corp.
20 Pa. D. & C.4th 1 (Erie County Court Common Pleas, 1993)
Aivazoglou v. Drever Furnaces
613 A.2d 595 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1992)
Rosmondo v. Life Insurance Co. of North America
606 A.2d 1172 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1992)
Lafferty v. Alan Wexler Agency, Inc.
574 A.2d 671 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1990)
Thomas v. Duquesne Light Co.
545 A.2d 289 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1988)
Hoare v. BELL TELEPHONE CO. OF PENN.
500 A.2d 1112 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1985)
Fretts v. Pavetti
422 A.2d 881 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1980)
Peaceman v. Tedesco
414 A.2d 1119 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1980)
Su-Jen Jeng Estate v. Witters
54 Pa. D. & C.2d 199 (Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, 1971)
Welling v. Libertini
53 Pa. D. & C.2d 60 (Fayette County Court, 1971)
Paulish v. Bakaitis
275 A.2d 318 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1971)
Harold v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
51 Pa. D. & C.2d 102 (Northampton County Court of Common Pleas, 1970)
Volk Estate
38 Pa. D. & C.2d 97 (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court, 1965)
Saracina v. Cotoia
208 A.2d 764 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1965)