Girard v. State

775 So. 2d 311, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1456, 2000 WL 192137
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 18, 2000
DocketNo. 2D98-2825
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 775 So. 2d 311 (Girard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Girard v. State, 775 So. 2d 311, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1456, 2000 WL 192137 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Darren Lee Girard challenges the habitual offender sentences imposed on twelve third-degree felony counts. He correctly claims that the thirty-year terms exceed the maximum habitual offender sentence allowed for a third-degree felony. See § 775.084(4)(a)3, Fla. Stat. (1995).

Accordingly, we reverse the sentences imposed on the third-degree felony counts and remand with directions to the trial court to correct the sentences to reflect the maximum habitual offender sentences, to-wit, ten years. Girard’s presence is not required for this correction.

BLUE, A.C.J, and FULMER and DAVIS, JJ, Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gulfwind South, Inc. v. Jones
775 So. 2d 311 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
775 So. 2d 311, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1456, 2000 WL 192137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/girard-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.