Girard v. State
775 So. 2d 311, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1456, 2000 WL 192137
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 18, 2000·No. No. 2D98-2825·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Darren Lee Girard challenges the habitual offender sentences imposed on twelve third-degree felony counts. He correctly claims that the thirty-year terms exceed the maximum habitual offender sentence allowed for a third-degree felony. See § 775.084(4)(a)3, Fla. Stat. (1995).
Accordingly, we reverse the sentences imposed on the third-degree felony counts and remand with directions to the trial court to correct the sentences to reflect the maximum habitual offender sentences, to-wit, ten years. Girard’s presence is not required for this correction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Girard v. State, 775 So. 2d 311, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1456, 2000 WL 192137 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
775 So. 2d 311 (Girard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gulfwind South, Inc. v. Jones
775 So. 2d 311 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)