Girard v. Miller
This text of 43 P.2d 510 (Girard v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff seeks herein a writ of mandate to compel the defendant, who has heretofore refused, to provide a ballot title for a referendum petition, under chapter 210, Idaho Session Laws, 1933. An alternative writ issued and the case has been argued and submitted.
The defendant justifies his refusal on various statutory and constitutional grounds, and questions have been argued and presented to the court, none of which are deemed to be at the present time properly before the court, or essential to a decision of this matter.
The sole point now determined, and deemed necessary to be determined, is that the duty devolving upon the defendant is ministerial. (Beem v. Davis et al., 31 Ida. 730, 175 Pac. 959; Logan v. Carter et al., 49 Ida. 393, at 402, 288 Pac. 424; Porter and Adams v. Adair, 48 Ida. 248, 282 Pac. 379.)
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, that a peremptory writ of mandate issue forthwith, requiring defendant to immediately provide and return to plaintiff a title for the referendum ballot, in accordance with section 9, chapter 210, supra.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
43 P.2d 510, 55 Idaho 430, 1935 Ida. LEXIS 81, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/girard-v-miller-idaho-1935.