Giraldez v. Bratton

215 A.D.2d 210, 626 N.Y.S.2d 484, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4991
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 11, 1995·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Elliott Wilk, J.), entered on or about November 9, 1994, dismissing the CPLR article 78 petition challenging respondent’s determination to deny petitioner a member-of-service (MOS) license after he retired from the New York City Police Department, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Respondent’s determination denying petitioner a MOS license upon his retirement from the New York City Police Department was not arbitrary and capricious since under departmental policy it is respondent’s practice to deny such applications if the applicant retired without firearms privi[211] leges (see, Matter of Laier v McGuire, 111 AD2d 43). Since possession of a pistol license is a privilege and not a right (Sewell v City of New York, 182 AD2d 469, 472, Iv denied 80 NY2d 756), and the determination has a rational basis, the application was properly dismissed. We note it was petitioner’s own action instigating his immediate retirement which prevented a hearing upon the charges underlying respondent’s withdrawal of petitioner’s firearm privileges while he was a member of the Police Department. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Kupferman and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Giraldez v. Bratton, 215 A.D.2d 210, 626 N.Y.S.2d 484, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4991 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

215 A.D.2d 210 (Giraldez v. Bratton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Jones v. O'Neill
2021 NY Slip Op 05167 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Matter of Wiesner v. City of New York
129 A.D.3d 412 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)