Gipson v. State
This text of 216 S.W. 870 (Gipson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appellant plead guilty in the District Court of Smith County, of the offense of manufacturing intoxicating liquor, and was given a penalty of one year in the penitentiary.
A motion for a new trial was filed, upon the grounds that the liquor was not shown to be intoxicating, and that it .was not shown that the same was not made for sacramental purposes.
A plea of guilty, under our practice, admits all the criminating facts alleged, and evidence is admitted only for the purpose of enabling the jury to determine the penalty. However, the evidence in the statement of facts in this case, shows that the liquor was intoxicating.
The charge of the court and the indictment appear to be in accordance with the law, and, finding no error, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
216 S.W. 870, 86 Tex. Crim. 364, 1919 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gipson-v-state-texcrimapp-1919.