Gipson v. State
983 So. 2d 678, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 8123, 2008 WL 2261541
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 4, 2008·No. Nos. 3D08-1057, 3D08-1058·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Affirmed. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b) (imposing a two-year time limit to file a motion for postconviction relief after the judgment and sentence become final in a non-capital case); Griffin v. State, 976 So.2d 107, 108 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (noting that “[a] petition for habeas corpus cannot substitute for a rule 3.850 motion, nor may it be used to, circumvent a rule 3.850 motion barred by the two-year limitations [679]*679period or the proscription against successive motions”) (citation omitted).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gipson v. State, 983 So. 2d 678, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 8123, 2008 WL 2261541 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).
983 So. 2d 678 (Gipson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stubbs v. State
983 So. 2d 678 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)