Gipson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gipson v. State

654 So. 2d 1258, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5084, 1995 WL 277081

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 12, 1995·No. No. 93-02881·Published

Opinion

FULMER, Judge.

Earl Gipson appeals from Ms conviction and sentence for battery on a law enforcement officer. Gipson’s appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). After an independent review of the record and law, we see no error affecting his conviction and, therefore, affirm. However, we strike the second sentence of probation condition # 4 and the first sentence of probation condition # 7, neither of which were orally pronounced at sentencing. See Emond v. State, 652 So.2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

DANAHY, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FULMER, Judge.

Earl Gipson appeals from Ms conviction and sentence for battery on a law enforcement officer. Gipson’s appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). After an independent review of the record and law, we see no error affecting his conviction and, therefore, affirm. However, we strike the second sentence of probation condition # 4 and the first sentence of probation condition # 7, neither of which were orally pronounced at sentencing. See Emond v. State, 652 So.2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

DANAHY, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND, J., concur.

Gipson v. State, 654 So. 2d 1258, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5084, 1995 WL 277081 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

654 So. 2d 1258 (Gipson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related