Giovanniello v. Germeroth

243 A.D. 624
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1935
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 243 A.D. 624 (Giovanniello v. Germeroth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Giovanniello v. Germeroth, 243 A.D. 624 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

Action for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by the infant plaintiff through the negligence of the defend[625]*625ants, and by his father for expenses and loss of services. All parties stipulated in open court that the trial should “ proceed with eleven jurors with the same force and effect as if the jury were constituted of twelve.” Judgment for defendants unanimously affirmed, with costs. The only point made by appellants is that the trial court was in error in permitting the trial to proceed with eleven jurors. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ashdown v. Kluckhohn
90 Misc. 2d 618 (New York Supreme Court, 1977)
Brous v. Town of Hempstead
272 A.D.2d 31 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1947)
Neumann v. Kurek
175 Misc. 238 (New York Supreme Court, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
243 A.D. 624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/giovanniello-v-germeroth-nyappdiv-1935.