Giovagnoni v. Murray
263 A.D. 713, 31 N.Y.S.2d 49
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 28, 1941·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinions
Appellant’s contention that the charge of the court was highly objectionable and erroneous is well founded. However, upon all the evidence we find that appellant failed to make out a prima facie case. As appellant would not be entitled to prevail in any event, the judgment in favor of respondent should be affirmed, with costs. (Gotham Construction Corp. v. City of New York, 233 App. Div. 699; Wood v. Wyeth, 106 id. 21, 24.)
Martin, P. J., Townley, Cohn and Callahan, JJ., concur; O’Malley, J., dissents and votes to reverse and grant a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Giovagnoni v. Murray, 263 A.D. 713, 31 N.Y.S.2d 49 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).
263 A.D. 713 (Giovagnoni v. Murray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Drew v. Troy Fifth Avenue Bus Co.
9 A.D.2d 587 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)
Duner v. Hudson & Manhattan Railroad
264 A.D. 229 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1942)