Giovagnoni v. Murray
This text of 263 A.D. 713 (Giovagnoni v. Murray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Appellant’s contention that the charge of the court was highly objectionable and erroneous is well founded. However, upon all the evidence we find that appellant failed to make out a prima facie case. As appellant would not be entitled to prevail in any event, the judgment in favor of respondent should be affirmed, with costs. (Gotham Construction Corp. v. City of New York, 233 App. Div. 699; Wood v. Wyeth, 106 id. 21, 24.)
Martin, P. J., Townley, Cohn and Callahan, JJ., concur; O’Malley, J., dissents and votes to reverse and grant a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
263 A.D. 713, 31 N.Y.S.2d 49, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/giovagnoni-v-murray-nyappdiv-1941.